4K resolution has been highly popular in recent televisions. Computer displays are slowly catching up to the 4K resolution trend. While 1440p was never a popular resolution for televisions, it is becoming more popular among laptop displays and computer monitors.
In the duel of 1440p vs. 4K, which is better? Which resolution is better for gaming and which is better for productivity? In this epic 1440p versus 4K comparison, we’ll attempt to discover answers to all of these questions. So, let’s start with the fundamentals of 1440p and 4K.
More information about 1080p and 1440p may be found there.
1440p is a screen resolution with a horizontal resolution of 2560 pixels and a vertical resolution of 1440 pixels. Because the original high definition or HD resolution is 1280 x 720 pixels, 1440p is referred to as Quad HD because it has four times the pixel count.
Laptop displays and monitors are gradually moving away from HD and Full HD (1080p) resolutions and toward 1440p resolution, which has 78 percent more pixels than 1080p.
Whether you’ve heard of 1440p or not, you’ve almost certainly heard of 4K Resolution, which is one of the most common display resolutions on TVs. 4K, often known as Ultra HD or UHD, is the genuine successor to 1080p, with four times the resolution.
3840 horizontal pixels and 2160 vertical pixels make up a 4K resolution. 4K is sometimes known as 2160p, following the convention of calling resolutions depending on the number of vertical pixels.
The computer monitor industry is still catching up to 4K, with manufacturers gradually adding 4K displays to their product lines. However, because of the large number of pixels in 4K (around 8 million), the hardware (CPU and GPU) must be of the highest quality.
Pros of 1440p
- With 78 percent more pixels than 1080p, this is a substantial boost.
- 1440p monitors are ideal for gamers since they have high refresh rates (144Hz or greater).
Cons of 1440p
- Not appropriate for viewing full-resolution movies and streaming services.
Pros of 4K
- 4K has four times the number of pixels as 1080p. So there’s more space to work with.
- Because most material is filmed in 4K, it’s ideal for viewing movies and streaming services.
- Console gaming is recommended.
Cons of 4K
- Extremely costly.
- To run a 4K display, you’ll need top-tier graphics cards and a CPU.
- Low refresh rates are often available.
- Competitive players dislike it.
- The distinction between 1440p and 4k
Let’s compare and contrast 4K vs 1440p in terms of resolution, refresh rates, system requirements, and so on.
As previously stated, 1440p features a horizontal and vertical resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. These figures may not seem to be significant when compared to 1920 x 1080, however, a 1440p display contains 78% more pixels than a 1080p panel.
In comparison to a 1080p resolution, the additional pixels come in useful since you have more workspace. This implies that a 1440p monitor provides more real estate for the same screen size, allowing you to comfortably run two applications side by side and work concurrently.
You don’t have to scroll too much in single apps like browsers or editing (photo and video) software.
4K resolution is a whole other animal. It has four times the number of pixels as a 1080p display. It’s especially handy in productivity apps like a picture and video editing, where you don’t want to miss anything.
The pixel density for a given resolution is determined by the monitor’s size. If the pixel density is poor, for example, on a larger screen with a lesser resolution, the picture on the screen will be fuzzy and unwatchable.
As a result, for a 1440p resolution monitor, we suggest a screen size of 27″ to 32″ and 32″ or higher for a 4K resolution monitor.
While current 1080p displays have very high refresh rates (up to 240Hz), 1440p and 4K monitors still have lower refresh rates. Even if they have faster refresh rates, the cost increases dramatically.
For all purposes, the most common resolution and refresh rate combination is 1440p and 144Hz (gaming, watching streaming content, everyday usage, and productivity). This combination doesn’t have to break the budget, and we expect 1440p monitor costs to fall as the technology becomes more common.
When compared to a 1080p display, driving a 1440p monitor has a large overhead. If you want to use a 4K display, you’ll need a strong CPU and graphics card, both of which must be high-end alternatives.
For 1440p and 4K displays, Nvidia’s RTX 3000 Series and AMD’s RX 6000 Series graphics cards are now available. Please do a lot of research on graphics cards and choose one depending on the resolution, refresh rate, and price of your display.
If you want to watch movies and videos on your displays in addition to doing your work, a 4K monitor is the ideal option. The majority of streaming material is accessible in 4K, including Netflix, Amazon Prime, and even YouTube.
A 1440p resolution display may be used to view material, however appropriate pixel to pixel picture processing requires lowering the resolution.
The time it takes for a pixel to shift from one color to another, commonly grey to grey, is measured in milliseconds (ms) (sometimes black to white). Lower reaction time is desirable since it implies the display can change colors rapidly as the CPU commands. This is critical in gaming and video editing since you don’t want a ‘ghosting’ effect caused by a delayed display response.
A reaction time of 5ms or less is regarded as satisfactory, depending on the kind of panel used for the monitor. TN panels offer a very short reaction time in general, however low response times are also attainable with the more common IPS panels.
If you look at the current trend in TV and monitor displays, 1080p resolution for monitors and both 1080p and 4K resolutions for TVs have become popular. The emergence of more powerful CPUs and graphics cards seems to be shifting this trend. There are more 1440p and 4K displays on the market, and 4K and 8K TVs are becoming more common.
In terms of visual quality and screen real estate, a 1440p resolution display is an excellent boost over a 1080p monitor. Gaming, productivity (photo and video apps), media consumption, and daily usage are all possible with it (browsing, office calls, etc.).
The pricing is the last and most essential consideration. If you’re upgrading from 1080p to 1440p or 4K, be prepared to shell out some cash since the price difference between the two is enormous. Surprisingly, there isn’t much of a difference between 1440p and 4K displays, but they are still pricey (prices for 1440p at least may go down as gaming industry is moving towards that resolution).
Aside from the monitor’s price, your current graphics card may not be capable of driving a 1440p panel, much alone a 4K one. As a result, you’ll need to get a new and powerful graphics card, which will raise the entire cost of the update.
Monitors with 1440p and 4K resolutions are both excellent for gaming. If you’re a competitive gamer with a reasonably strong graphics card, you’ll need a high refresh rate display to force those high frame rates out of your GPU.
Despite having outstanding visual quality, 4K resolution has low refresh rates. The majority of 4K displays come with a 60Hz refresh rate, and greater refresh rates cost a lot of money.
So, for serious gaming, a high refresh rate 1440p resolution display won’t break the bank while yet providing an excellent gaming experience. 1440p monitors with a 144Hz refresh rate are fairly popular, and they are also reasonably priced.
However, if you play console games, a 4K resolution (on either a TV or a monitor) is preferable since console games are developed particularly for that technology. We anticipate a similar situation with 4K displays, i.e., inexpensive monitors with high refresh rates, to emerge in the near future.
Finally, which is preferable: 1440p or 4K? The answer is dependent on your specific needs and financial constraints, however, if you want to improve your existing monitor without spending a lot, a 1440p monitor with at least a 144Hz refresh rate is the best option.